Evangelical Egalitarians? Dr. Matt O'Reilly
May 5, 2022
Is an evangelical egalitarian an oxymoron? As Wesleyans engage in evangelical circles, tensions often arise around the role of women in the church and the home. Certainly, complementary distinctions between men and women exist and are worthy of celebration. At the same time, most in the Wesleyan tradition affirm that women should be encouraged to preach. Dr. Matt O’Reilly and I talk about the challenge of engaging the larger evangelical community regarding women in ministry. Check out this podcast here:
YouTube - https://youtu.be/AukCjYd5750
Here’s a link to an article Dr. O’Reilly has written on this subject. https://www.theologyproject.online/post/complementarian-rhetoric-calmy-considered-a-response-to-denny-burk-and-owen-strachan
Five Steps to Deeper Teaching and Preaching- Five Steps to Deeper Preaching and Teaching - I’m excited to share some news with you. Recently, I updated that PDF document and added a 45-minute teaching video with slides, explaining this tool. It's like a mini-course. If you sign up for my list, I will send this free resource to you. Sign up here - Five Steps to Deeper Teaching and Preaching.
Today’s episode is brought to you by two sponsors:
Bill Roberts is a financial advisor, who has been serving the retirement planning and investment needs of individuals, families, non-profits, and churches for 25 years. He is a Certified Financial Planner and accredited investment fiduciary. Bill specializes in working with Salvation Army employees and officers by helping them realize their financial goals.
You can find out more about Bill’s business at www.WilliamHRoberts.com
Wesley Biblical Seminary - Interested in getting going deeper in your faith, check out our certificate programs, B.A., M.A.s, M.Div., and D.Min degrees. You will study with world-class faculty and the most racially diverse student body in the country. www.wbs.edu
Welcome to the more to the story podcast I am glad that you have come along today we have a great show in store for you and I have my friend, Dr matt o'reilly.
00:01:49.020 --> 00:01:56.340
Andy Miller III: Whose an adjunct Professor here at Wesley biblical seminary he helped lead our doctor of ministry program and the research portion there and.
00:01:56.550 --> 00:02:07.080
Andy Miller III: Probably, most importantly, he serves as a pastor of hope whole united Methodist church in Alabama and the Montgomery area I said, most importantly, man i'm sure there's some other things are more important to you like your family.
00:02:08.580 --> 00:02:10.980
Matt O'Reilly: family is is is high on the list.
00:02:11.100 --> 00:02:12.750
Matt O'Reilly: Absolutely, the highest place on the list.
00:02:13.260 --> 00:02:25.650
Andy Miller III: So I didn't mean this make your church, the most important thing to you, but maybe I was saying, your church and your commitment to your calling there, maybe is more important than even web so we'll take that as well.
00:02:25.710 --> 00:02:34.740
Matt O'Reilly: Well, I try to I try to find a way to hold all of the various hats that I wear together in balance, as well as much as I can so.
00:02:35.880 --> 00:02:40.470
Matt O'Reilly: But yeah they're all they're they're important aspects of the way I understand my location as a pastor theologian.
00:02:41.040 --> 00:02:42.090
Andy Miller III: yeah yeah so.
00:02:42.600 --> 00:02:46.140
Andy Miller III: let's talk about that for a second and thanks so much matt for coming on.
00:02:46.320 --> 00:02:49.170
Andy Miller III: I think you all, are going to enjoy this podcast today where we're going to talk about.
00:02:49.560 --> 00:03:04.920
Andy Miller III: you've met my have drawn you in by our title but that's important piece to matt like even how you respond to this is that you see your vocation as pastor theologian, a lot of people say think there might be two separate things there, so what is a pastor theologian, what is this discipline.
00:03:05.400 --> 00:03:07.530
Matt O'Reilly: Sure sure so so.
00:03:09.240 --> 00:03:19.470
Matt O'Reilly: i'm a part of a group of pastors called the Center for pastor theologians which listeners may be interested in taking a look at that pastor theologians calm, I believe, is the address you can Google.
00:03:19.980 --> 00:03:30.030
Matt O'Reilly: cpt are Center for pastor theologians and it's a group of pastors who have done usually advanced degrees of some sort or another, so so there's some some.
00:03:31.170 --> 00:03:32.250
Matt O'Reilly: Formal theological.
00:03:32.250 --> 00:03:32.820
00:03:33.960 --> 00:03:44.970
Matt O'Reilly: But instead of seeking the primary expression of that training in an academic setting primarily, we are committed to using our training and.
00:03:45.810 --> 00:03:57.210
Matt O'Reilly: gifts and the skills we've been been given through our training in the context of the local church and the idea is every every pastor functions as a theologian.
00:03:58.530 --> 00:03:59.790
Matt O'Reilly: In many ways.
00:03:59.850 --> 00:04:00.510
Andy Miller III: Right right.
00:04:01.140 --> 00:04:09.750
Matt O'Reilly: But not every pastor is necessarily a professional theologian, in the sense of academics writing books and things like that, and so so.
00:04:11.220 --> 00:04:16.170
Matt O'Reilly: We we Center for pastor theologians have some concerns about what seems to be.
00:04:16.650 --> 00:04:19.440
Matt O'Reilly: A pretty strong division between the Church in the Academy.
00:04:19.770 --> 00:04:29.520
Matt O'Reilly: Right pastors don't think of themselves as theologians even though it's the pastor's job, let me, I should say pastors in general don't think of themselves as theologians.
00:04:29.850 --> 00:04:34.410
Matt O'Reilly: By the pastor's job to speak about God to the people of God, on a weekly.
00:04:35.160 --> 00:04:36.900
Matt O'Reilly: or even more frequent basis.
00:04:37.200 --> 00:04:46.560
Matt O'Reilly: Right and a lot of times the Laity members of the congregation don't think of their pastors and theologians I was with a group of Lady not long ago, and ask them.
00:04:47.910 --> 00:04:53.280
Matt O'Reilly: Whether they thought of their pastors whether they knew any theologians or whether they thought or their pastors is a theologian.
00:04:53.760 --> 00:05:07.140
Matt O'Reilly: And they indicated that I was the first one, there was there were you know one or two others who may be kind of fit the mold a bit, but as far as like like formally trained professional theologian writing things they hadn't had a theologian for pastor before.
00:05:07.770 --> 00:05:10.470
Matt O'Reilly: And I think that that we've sort of.
00:05:10.770 --> 00:05:15.300
Matt O'Reilly: instantiated that really strong distinction and that it's not helpful.
00:05:15.930 --> 00:05:35.220
Matt O'Reilly: Right so, so I would want to say we have academic click theologians who you know who work in seminary settings or other academic settings to do crucial work, who have the time and the resources to do a lot of research that a pastor theologian is not going to do or not going to be.
00:05:35.250 --> 00:05:35.430
00:05:37.260 --> 00:05:46.770
Matt O'Reilly: But on the other hand, in a complimentary fashion, I don't want I don't want us to see these two roles in any way as as antagonistic towards one.
00:05:46.770 --> 00:05:47.130
Andy Miller III: Right, no.
00:05:47.940 --> 00:05:55.230
Matt O'Reilly: one's role, but the pastor theologian is or ecclesial theologians how we might say it we've got academic theologians.
00:05:55.620 --> 00:06:08.880
Matt O'Reilly: or theologians who work in an academic concept text and ecclesial theologians who are theologians who were primarily primarily in an ecclesial or church context and i'm not going to be doing the sort of.
00:06:10.110 --> 00:06:22.260
Matt O'Reilly: The same sort of research that many academic theologians will do with you know significant time in libraries are looking at primary sources and different kinds of things like that the.
00:06:23.340 --> 00:06:28.920
Matt O'Reilly: The pastor theologian of the ecclesial theologian, a lot of times is is not simply translating.
00:06:29.880 --> 00:06:33.450
Matt O'Reilly: theology, and the local church, but is offering theological shepherding.
00:06:33.990 --> 00:06:41.640
Matt O'Reilly: At a serious level for the larger church local church and the larger church so yeah one of the ways we talked about this, and this.
00:06:42.090 --> 00:06:50.700
Matt O'Reilly: has shaped a lot of our doctrine ministry research at Wesley seminary is we might think of this in terms of theological appropriation for example.
00:06:51.090 --> 00:06:57.600
Matt O'Reilly: So, so what are some of the issues that that are on the front burner for the Church, so to speak, what are really.
00:06:58.200 --> 00:07:03.480
Matt O'Reilly: issues where the church needs theological shepherding where we need theologians to think through.
00:07:04.140 --> 00:07:15.240
Matt O'Reilly: Like today we're going to be thinking about the relationship between men and women and and and and how that relates to roles in ministry right that's a front burner issue it's very much on people's minds.
00:07:15.690 --> 00:07:23.220
Matt O'Reilly: And what does it look like for academic theologians to help us with that, but also what does it look like for people who work in ministry context every day.
00:07:23.580 --> 00:07:39.480
Matt O'Reilly: To help us think through that at a serious level and offer some theological shepherding and and I think that the context is going to maybe give us a slightly different take on that and just being in in the ministry setting is going to kind of drive the way we come at that.
00:07:39.510 --> 00:07:40.200
Andy Miller III: And so I.
00:07:40.440 --> 00:07:52.110
Matt O'Reilly: We need to see pastors as theologians even if they're not writing theologians they're still preaching theologians who are leading the people of God to think theologically.
00:07:52.470 --> 00:07:55.440
Matt O'Reilly: yeah you're doing that, whether you realize it or not.
00:07:56.550 --> 00:07:59.820
Matt O'Reilly: I think, to do it well, you probably need to recognize it.
00:08:00.270 --> 00:08:02.370
Matt O'Reilly: Right and strive to speak welcome.
00:08:03.000 --> 00:08:11.910
Andy Miller III: This is interesting, and this is the tasks that people enter into and the entrance a ministry i've been found very helpful, particularly in 15 years of Ministry.
00:08:12.450 --> 00:08:25.440
Andy Miller III: Kevin man hoosiers description of the public theologian like the pastor's task in the Community, I imagine you in hope hall are like engaging your Community like I drove and visit your church, a few weeks ago.
00:08:26.280 --> 00:08:36.300
Andy Miller III: there's a you know gigantic plant like not far away, well, you have something to say very good for people who work in that plant, the way this society is structured there.
00:08:37.050 --> 00:08:41.580
Andy Miller III: Being a public theologian that was helpful for me as a savage army officer who.
00:08:42.210 --> 00:08:53.880
Andy Miller III: You know I had pastoral responsibilities for a congregation and ecclesial context, but often much of my work was with city council members board members fun in a fundraising capacity.
00:08:54.120 --> 00:09:00.210
Andy Miller III: Standing poor planning and zoning Commission these type of things, so I think these titles are helpful, I appreciate what you've done.
00:09:00.510 --> 00:09:10.380
Andy Miller III: To help put some bones that, and you have your own kind of way of expressing this through your own online platform and people can find you, is it the theology project is a.com.
00:09:10.890 --> 00:09:13.080
Matt O'Reilly: Oh you're on the project dot online.
00:09:13.410 --> 00:09:14.430
Andy Miller III: Oh yeah okay gotcha.
00:09:14.490 --> 00:09:15.090
Matt O'Reilly: yeah.
00:09:15.180 --> 00:09:16.290
Matt O'Reilly: You can find videos.
00:09:16.980 --> 00:09:19.620
Matt O'Reilly: i'm sorry matt o'reilly dot net i'll get you to the same place as well.
00:09:20.070 --> 00:09:20.490
Matt O'Reilly: Okay.
00:09:20.760 --> 00:09:27.990
Andy Miller III: that's great and that's kind of what brings us here today is a you had a response to something that's been an itch.
00:09:28.230 --> 00:09:40.050
Andy Miller III: That, I think a lot of people in my audience have had actually people have reached out to me with the very, very type of questions that you are answering or the tension point that exists within.
00:09:40.350 --> 00:09:48.600
Andy Miller III: Broad evangelicalism so that's what I want let's get into that here one of those challenges is is that we often find resonance.
00:09:48.900 --> 00:09:59.100
Andy Miller III: In the evangelical world with people who come from a different perspective of us when it comes to what kind of wesleyan or reformed Calvinist traditions.
00:09:59.520 --> 00:10:15.090
Andy Miller III: And that leads to some other other kind of distinctions are made wow we might affirm the way that some folks in reformed traditions might speak of the authority of scripture may human sexuality in general.
00:10:15.540 --> 00:10:31.860
Andy Miller III: The necessity of conversion all types of things like that the thing that often comes up with some of these folks like, for instance Danny Burke oh and strand Albert Molar people who either have a lot of appreciation for and some some respects in some varying degrees between them.
00:10:33.270 --> 00:10:42.960
Andy Miller III: Women in ministry comes up and in Wesley biblical seminary affirms the role of women preachers and, as does, like most of the nominations that we serve.
00:10:43.290 --> 00:10:53.310
Andy Miller III: So you respond to this and I imagine there's a little bit of tension and even just doing that in the first place so tell us about your what generated this response to these folks.
00:10:53.700 --> 00:11:03.900
Matt O'Reilly: yeah so so basically the way that this came along, his own stran on Twitter tends to like to be dory.
00:11:04.290 --> 00:11:09.750
Matt O'Reilly: Yes, and and what's interesting, is it will go and say things, but then he won't engage the responses.
00:11:10.380 --> 00:11:15.690
Matt O'Reilly: And he frequently blocks, those who attempt to engage substantively with him which he did with me.
00:11:17.280 --> 00:11:18.390
Matt O'Reilly: And so, so.
00:11:19.560 --> 00:11:21.120
Matt O'Reilly: there's an element where it's a bit frustrating.
00:11:21.720 --> 00:11:22.110
Andy Miller III: yeah can.
00:11:22.140 --> 00:11:26.100
Matt O'Reilly: You make these kind of wild claims and then trained.
00:11:27.270 --> 00:11:35.370
Matt O'Reilly: Credible theologians attempt to engage and instead of actually engaging the arguments you just block them.
00:11:35.760 --> 00:11:38.400
Matt O'Reilly: All things a very unhealthy.
00:11:39.720 --> 00:11:42.030
Matt O'Reilly: and very pet store Lee irresponsible.
00:11:42.540 --> 00:11:43.650
Matt O'Reilly: hmm wow.
00:11:43.740 --> 00:11:49.290
Matt O'Reilly: In theory, I just it seems to me seems to be embarrassing as far as the Christian faith goes.
00:11:49.560 --> 00:11:49.860
Andy Miller III: Right.
00:11:50.220 --> 00:11:52.590
Matt O'Reilly: Like I want I want our students.
00:11:52.890 --> 00:11:59.880
Matt O'Reilly: Right, be able to engage seriously and at a robust level with charity and force.
00:12:00.360 --> 00:12:06.030
Matt O'Reilly: hmm I don't want them to just just cancel people they disagree with them.
00:12:06.270 --> 00:12:14.280
Matt O'Reilly: Right like so so it was a little bit you know i've seen that track record and then this comment came along, and I forget exactly how it went, but basically.
00:12:15.420 --> 00:12:21.900
Matt O'Reilly: One of the complimentary aneurysm and egalitarianism or evangelical egalitarianism.
00:12:24.120 --> 00:12:35.370
Matt O'Reilly: or these kind of different different different perspectives on women in ministry and that it flares up online and in social media every so often.
00:12:35.940 --> 00:12:43.800
Matt O'Reilly: And it's had some particularly intense flare ups here lately, particularly in relation to what's called first order doctrines and second order doctrines.
00:12:44.070 --> 00:12:44.610
Matt O'Reilly: Right so.
00:12:44.640 --> 00:12:48.660
Matt O'Reilly: First order doctrine would be something like the Trinity the resurrection of Jesus.
00:12:51.840 --> 00:12:53.130
Andy Miller III: Have nothing yeah.
00:12:53.520 --> 00:12:56.070
Matt O'Reilly: So, so the things that make you a Christian or not.
00:12:56.310 --> 00:13:01.320
Matt O'Reilly: Right right if you don't believe in the Trinity you you're not a part of the Orthodox Christian faith.
00:13:01.830 --> 00:13:09.360
Matt O'Reilly: Right that's tier one second order or tier two doctrines are the sorts of things where like honest Christians disagree.
00:13:10.230 --> 00:13:25.860
Matt O'Reilly: One of those is the role of women in ministry, so if Angelica legality reasons, like us, would affirm fundamental complementarity between men and women, that we would say that gender does not prohibit ministry offices or four roles.
00:13:26.130 --> 00:13:33.210
Matt O'Reilly: Right, so a compliment darien would say there's complementarity between men and women, so we agree with the on that.
00:13:33.420 --> 00:13:37.650
Matt O'Reilly: Right, they also say that scripture forbids women from holding pastoral offices.
00:13:37.770 --> 00:13:46.680
Matt O'Reilly: In teaching offices and so that's where the conflict is so strange I was reading came along and said something like i'm working from memory here is i'll paraphrase something like.
00:13:48.450 --> 00:13:53.460
Matt O'Reilly: You know, even though women in ministry is a second second order doctrine.
00:13:54.930 --> 00:14:00.420
Matt O'Reilly: It that we can't use that as an excuse for going soft on these sorts of things and.
00:14:01.440 --> 00:14:10.980
Matt O'Reilly: And those who, this was the part that really got me those who affirm women in ministry and teaching rules egalitarianism or denying the authority.
00:14:11.610 --> 00:14:14.220
Andy Miller III: They he said flatly denies biblical teaching.
00:14:14.400 --> 00:14:15.750
Andy Miller III: yeah you and I.
00:14:16.620 --> 00:14:23.550
Andy Miller III: People who work, we are a seminary we an order to work a summary, we form an errand see according to Chicago statement.
00:14:24.930 --> 00:14:29.220
Andy Miller III: And like pretty committed people around us most of the time we're called the fundamentalist right and i'm.
00:14:30.420 --> 00:14:43.140
Andy Miller III: But yet we're being called this because we, we are this type of complementary roles, nevertheless, he, like a firm, the role of women taking pastoral office we're ones who flat lead and I biblical teaching.
00:14:43.290 --> 00:14:44.970
Matt O'Reilly: So that that language.
00:14:45.060 --> 00:14:46.980
Matt O'Reilly: send me all for sparked me, so to speak.
00:14:48.750 --> 00:15:02.970
Matt O'Reilly: When you know the notion that a position I hold is said to flatly deny biblical teaching, you know i've said from the pulpit so many times, if I didn't believe that scripture was true and authoritative I would get a different job.
00:15:03.480 --> 00:15:06.840
Matt O'Reilly: Right I wouldn't get up at five o'clock on Sunday mornings.
00:15:07.230 --> 00:15:07.500
Andy Miller III: yeah.
00:15:07.530 --> 00:15:13.140
Matt O'Reilly: To go and teach the Bible if I didn't think it was both true and authoritative.
00:15:13.590 --> 00:15:20.760
Matt O'Reilly: Yes, and so so strange comment is just outlandish it's misleading.
00:15:22.710 --> 00:15:25.560
Matt O'Reilly: And, and it is slanderous right.
00:15:25.620 --> 00:15:32.640
Matt O'Reilly: it's it's it's a false claim in print and so, so I think we need to.
00:15:34.470 --> 00:15:39.120
Matt O'Reilly: Like there needs to be some accountability for that, and so I decided to write.
00:15:40.260 --> 00:15:48.450
Matt O'Reilly: to write a more kind of response, and then there were some other things didn't work and written some some some more substantive and more precise.
00:15:49.680 --> 00:16:02.130
Matt O'Reilly: Precise articles about this recently, but even with his precision and nuance far more than you get in a tweet it still basically amounted to if you don't hold my view you don't believe the Bible.
00:16:02.610 --> 00:16:03.330
Andy Miller III: Right right.
00:16:06.390 --> 00:16:16.110
Andy Miller III: yeah so we would affirm like you could there are there are matters where you can say that but let's talk about, then how we moved to interpretation, I mean that's part of like the next task I don't want to jump ahead of you.
00:16:16.140 --> 00:16:20.370
Matt O'Reilly: where you want to go somewhere else first well I just kind of want make sure we're moving along in an agreed pace.
00:16:20.400 --> 00:16:21.120
Matt O'Reilly: So I think.
00:16:21.480 --> 00:16:27.300
Matt O'Reilly: I think the crucial distinction, then, is, we need to make a distinction between authority and interpretation.
00:16:28.530 --> 00:16:29.010
Matt O'Reilly: So.
00:16:29.070 --> 00:16:34.980
Matt O'Reilly: yeah bird stran and some of the folks that they quote like league Duncan.
00:16:35.370 --> 00:16:37.320
Matt O'Reilly: who got a great deal in.
00:16:37.740 --> 00:16:45.000
Matt O'Reilly: Ways mark never i've had the chance to meet briefly and appreciate a lot of his work i've learned a great deal from him about.
00:16:45.150 --> 00:16:45.510
Andy Miller III: me to.
00:16:45.750 --> 00:16:46.350
00:16:47.670 --> 00:16:51.960
Matt O'Reilly: evangelism I uses evangelism texting evangelism classes.
00:16:53.880 --> 00:17:01.290
Matt O'Reilly: But on on this item, a lot of these guys kind of draw a pretty hard line in the sand and say something like.
00:17:02.850 --> 00:17:10.530
Matt O'Reilly: If you don't agree with the complimentary and approach you're rejecting the authority of scripture and so.
00:17:11.160 --> 00:17:26.520
Matt O'Reilly: The problem is, there is a category mistake right, we have two categories in play one is the objective truth of scripture and the other is yours yours and my subjective interpretation of scripture.
00:17:26.760 --> 00:17:27.570
Andy Miller III: Right right.
00:17:27.810 --> 00:17:31.650
Matt O'Reilly: So scripture is true objectively, regardless of what I think of it.
00:17:32.160 --> 00:17:32.400
Andy Miller III: Right.
00:17:32.640 --> 00:17:45.270
Matt O'Reilly: I could think I could reject it all together, I can affirm it all together, I could pick and choose which bits I like in which bits I don't my posture towards scripture does not change its objective trustworthiness.
00:17:45.600 --> 00:18:00.030
Matt O'Reilly: yeah so like it's That is something scripture is objectively true because it is given to us by God, whose character is objectively true right if we never existed scripture would still be true.
00:18:00.450 --> 00:18:08.250
Matt O'Reilly: Right my interpretation of scripture is subjective, that is to say it is.
00:18:09.510 --> 00:18:23.490
Matt O'Reilly: It is derived from my experience my reading of scripture my understanding of the tradition, my my my best attempts to read these texts in their original context I work, you know I mean.
00:18:24.780 --> 00:18:26.340
Matt O'Reilly: Take your New Testament scholar yeah.
00:18:26.400 --> 00:18:32.550
Matt O'Reilly: yeah i've taken an advanced degree in New Testament to learn to because I take the take seriously and want to.
00:18:33.180 --> 00:18:47.070
Matt O'Reilly: be able to interpret it well, so so but but, but my training as part of what I bring to the table to interpret my ecclesial background is part of what I bring to the table to interpret my own experiences.
00:18:48.240 --> 00:18:58.500
Matt O'Reilly: are part of what I bring to the table to interpret and that's true for function and the complimentary inside as well, they don't have some secret code object of interpretation, but no one else has.
00:18:59.220 --> 00:19:01.260
Matt O'Reilly: So Burke Danny Burke own stran.
00:19:01.560 --> 00:19:13.200
Matt O'Reilly: Their training is part of their subjective interpretation their ecclesial background, as part of their subjective interpretation and, and this is just part of the deal we can't do anything about it.
00:19:15.600 --> 00:19:26.610
Matt O'Reilly: So, so what we have to do is do the best we can, with our interpretations, but it's a false move to go and say my interpretation is the authoritative interpretation.
00:19:26.700 --> 00:19:33.720
Matt O'Reilly: Right, unless you have an ecclesial body or tradition, they can make that claim, you know, so the Roman Catholic Church.
00:19:34.050 --> 00:19:43.830
Matt O'Reilly: will give the give constituents of the Catholic Church, the authoritative interpretation, the bishops are the living voice of the Church, they can give.
00:19:44.520 --> 00:19:56.190
Matt O'Reilly: Roman Catholics an authoritative interpretation same is true in Eastern Orthodox Church in the United Methodist Church, which i'm apart, our discipline gives us authoritative interpretations, to some degree.
00:19:56.550 --> 00:19:57.660
Matt O'Reilly: I mean not the same degree is.
00:19:57.720 --> 00:20:08.400
Matt O'Reilly: Roman Catholic magisterium but each denomination each ecclesial body has articles of faith or some sort of statement of faith that that interprets certain scriptures.
00:20:09.660 --> 00:20:23.250
Matt O'Reilly: In specific ways and so those are authoritative for the tradition in which you fall but united Methodist interpretations, you know ecclesial interpretations are not authoritative for the Salvation Army or the southern backing.
00:20:23.280 --> 00:20:23.910
Andy Miller III: Right sure.
00:20:24.180 --> 00:20:41.100
Matt O'Reilly: So we have to think of these things in in in relation you're in you can only get an authoritative interpretation in an ecclesial tradition, where the Members agree to submit themselves to the to the to the ecclesial body that defines the authoritative interpretation.
00:20:41.580 --> 00:20:42.600
Andy Miller III: For an individual.
00:20:42.840 --> 00:20:43.230
Matt O'Reilly: going to.
00:20:43.440 --> 00:20:52.290
Andy Miller III: attack, so this is really good and I imagine, some people are going there already in their mind, so I just want to have the relieve them or think through this as it relates to human sexuality.
00:20:52.530 --> 00:20:56.010
Andy Miller III: So, like this is the big concern okay well that's just your interpretation.
00:20:56.190 --> 00:21:00.300
Andy Miller III: But I think what i've said in correct me if i'm correct me if you have a different way of nuance, and this is a.
00:21:00.600 --> 00:21:09.120
Andy Miller III: say that, like those authoritative communities authoritative bodies have a firm throughout centuries of the Christian church.
00:21:09.450 --> 00:21:21.360
Andy Miller III: The same view of human sexuality as particularly as it relates to what sexual sin is at this and also the biblical monologue on the subject is incredibly consistent there's not really a way.
00:21:21.570 --> 00:21:31.050
Andy Miller III: To move outside of that without rejecting authority scripture so some people would say, well, here Andy and matt you're critiquing the.
00:21:31.500 --> 00:21:39.540
Andy Miller III: The these folks because of women in ministry and but you're doing the same thing with sexuality, do you think that that that i've made a good enough case that there's a distinction there.
00:21:39.840 --> 00:21:46.050
Matt O'Reilly: yeah there well there's if you just do it text by text and that's that's the way these things as a new doesn't guy.
00:21:46.260 --> 00:22:01.680
Matt O'Reilly: that's my effort to do it, I think it's the right way to do it, you just go text by text and do the exit Jesus right it's not particularly I mean it's pretty clear the New Testament doesn't give a pathway towards the affirmation of same sex practices.
00:22:01.890 --> 00:22:02.550
Andy Miller III: Right right.
00:22:04.050 --> 00:22:07.020
Andy Miller III: And that's held by scholars, who would have a different view.
00:22:07.560 --> 00:22:10.950
Matt O'Reilly: yeah so I mean you know you get people like Luke Timothy Johnson.
00:22:11.280 --> 00:22:16.620
Matt O'Reilly: Right highly credible New Testament scholar he affirms same sex practices.
00:22:17.790 --> 00:22:28.620
Matt O'Reilly: I mean I don't want to over speak for him, but his he's you know he's he's on the progressive side of the issue he just think but but, but he thinks it's eminently clear that Paul condemn same safe practices.
00:22:28.830 --> 00:22:29.430
Andy Miller III: Right right.
00:22:29.460 --> 00:22:30.570
Matt O'Reilly: He just thinks Paul was wrong.
00:22:31.080 --> 00:22:32.040
Andy Miller III: Right exactly.
00:22:32.100 --> 00:22:36.480
Matt O'Reilly: So you know you do get you do get attempts I don't want to I don't want to.
00:22:38.250 --> 00:22:43.380
Matt O'Reilly: commit a hasty generalization myself you do get attempts to sort of.
00:22:44.070 --> 00:22:56.910
Matt O'Reilly: Say that Paul created space for the sorts of same sex relationships we have today that weren't the same sort of thing like, then I don't find those persuasive and I think pretty serious critiques of that has been done, and done successfully.
00:22:58.380 --> 00:23:02.400
Matt O'Reilly: But, but if you look at the tasks that involve women in ministry and we can take a look at a few of them if you.
00:23:02.400 --> 00:23:02.700
Matt O'Reilly: Like.
00:23:03.240 --> 00:23:11.070
Matt O'Reilly: they're not even remotely as clear cut as the compliment periods would want you to say and people like Danny bird I think in the article which I responded.
00:23:11.670 --> 00:23:15.420
Andy Miller III: A month or so i'll post a link to that to in the show notes, you can find.
00:23:15.630 --> 00:23:17.790
Andy Miller III: matt article there yeah click on that sorry to interrupt you.
00:23:17.850 --> 00:23:25.080
Matt O'Reilly: But but but Danny and some of the folks he quotes tend to say things like well you give a little on women in ministry okay.
00:23:25.590 --> 00:23:32.100
Matt O'Reilly: But it's a slippery slope to you know affirmation of full affirmation of LGBT Q, like all that.
00:23:32.670 --> 00:23:49.860
Matt O'Reilly: And I would want to argue, and I would point to plenty of evangelicalism New Testament scholars who argue that it's not a slippery slope, and they they don't do that right, you have plenty of folks who are thoroughly committed to trustworthiness of scripture thoroughly committed to.
00:23:52.230 --> 00:23:58.410
Matt O'Reilly: A traditional orthodox understanding of the complimentary complimentary nature of Christian marriage.
00:23:59.550 --> 00:24:13.830
Matt O'Reilly: Who affirm the full full roll women in ministry in full roles so it's not it's not like oh i'm that one guy who who who hasn't fallen down the slippery slope there's there are plenty of folks.
00:24:14.100 --> 00:24:14.580
Andy Miller III: Right.
00:24:14.640 --> 00:24:16.860
Matt O'Reilly: And you listen to the article people who have been.
00:24:16.950 --> 00:24:20.490
Andy Miller III: You know, Presidents of the President of evangelical theological society, I mean.
00:24:20.970 --> 00:24:27.930
Andy Miller III: We could go down your mentor and you've been with ringtone you could mean we can just keep on going at a long list of folks.
00:24:28.110 --> 00:24:28.530
Andy Miller III: are in.
00:24:28.680 --> 00:24:33.810
Andy Miller III: really happened to be also in our traditions, to a lot of times but not not exclusively right.
00:24:34.530 --> 00:24:38.460
Matt O'Reilly: yeah yeah I think eight of the past presidents of the Angelika theological.
00:24:38.910 --> 00:24:47.970
Matt O'Reilly: theological society have been egalitarians which means they earn the guarantee of scripture and they have firm full full roles for women in ministry, so it seems to me just.
00:24:48.810 --> 00:24:56.430
Matt O'Reilly: Just all together misleading to say that this slippery slope exists, and there are literally dozens and dozens and dozens of people.
00:24:56.910 --> 00:25:06.330
Matt O'Reilly: In the evangelical Community not just people but scholars, I mean there's plenty more outside the scope of scholarship, but there are plenty of scholars, you can go to for these things.
00:25:06.630 --> 00:25:09.210
Andy Miller III: there's plenty of people not slipping down that slippery slope.
00:25:09.270 --> 00:25:20.280
Matt O'Reilly: that's right and and it makes me think I and that's why that's why I was willing to take a rather aggressive posture in my my essay is because people like going strain and any bird don't get to pretend they don't know about this stuff.
00:25:20.460 --> 00:25:22.260
Matt O'Reilly: right there both PhDs.
00:25:23.640 --> 00:25:31.170
Matt O'Reilly: You know Danny Burke, is, I think he's the President of the Council on biblical manhood moment they know the material they know who the people are who are out there.
00:25:31.590 --> 00:25:39.060
Matt O'Reilly: If they you know they don't get to say oh I haven't heard about those folks like it's easy to find you can find them on Amazon.
00:25:40.560 --> 00:25:41.190
Matt O'Reilly: In plenty.
00:25:41.670 --> 00:25:44.430
Andy Miller III: So right, and I think you and I would both say.
00:25:44.790 --> 00:25:59.550
Andy Miller III: We wouldn't say that they are not allowed to hold this position, like they come to a different view that and and they could be a part of organizations are denominations that do not affirm that that's fine but let's not call people's evangelical street cred you know into question.
00:25:59.820 --> 00:26:06.120
Matt O'Reilly: that's right yeah and and and I have plenty of friends who disagree with me on this, who are complimentary.
00:26:06.930 --> 00:26:24.750
Matt O'Reilly: We love each other, we are friendly we are charitable we pray together we care for one another, our kids play together right it's not it doesn't have to be an aggressive antagonistic relationship and in these days of just such deep conflict in our society and polarization.
00:26:25.110 --> 00:26:37.800
Matt O'Reilly: yeah I would think that you know it would be better for those of us who are committed to the trustworthiness of scripture to to say you know I don't agree with o'reilly on these sorts of things, or whoever.
00:26:37.860 --> 00:26:38.460
Andy Miller III: Right right.
00:26:39.000 --> 00:26:40.950
Matt O'Reilly: But in this world.
00:26:42.030 --> 00:26:49.830
Matt O'Reilly: Of polarization and conflict can't we can't we focus on this can we just give each other the benefit of the doubt all.
00:26:50.100 --> 00:26:50.910
Andy Miller III: Right right.
00:26:52.320 --> 00:27:02.670
Matt O'Reilly: So I wasn't so much arguing against complimentary aneurysm i've done that, before and i'll be happy to have that conversation I was primarily in the essay you reference arguing against the posture.
00:27:03.030 --> 00:27:10.890
Matt O'Reilly: Yes, and when I take to be core argumentative strategies that a couple of particular complimentary things are taking.
00:27:11.730 --> 00:27:16.530
Andy Miller III: yeah and it's a pretty strong conclusion to this essay that you wrote, because you end with us and.
00:27:17.970 --> 00:27:34.260
Andy Miller III: Sorry, so I can't help but laugh a little bit, but just to confess and repent I mean that's the call now it's like a it's a prophetic posture that you're taking but you you feel like there's a reason to make that call because they're they're really calling into question.
00:27:35.580 --> 00:27:39.840
Andy Miller III: Somebody else's like the foundation for their their life and Ministry.
00:27:40.380 --> 00:27:44.820
Matt O'Reilly: that's right that's right so here's here's here's an example, so I teach I teach my students.
00:27:46.560 --> 00:27:58.890
Matt O'Reilly: to represent those with whom they disagree as ably and as as accurately as possible, so we're wesleyan if they're writing something on Calvinism I don't want them to to.
00:28:00.900 --> 00:28:02.730
Matt O'Reilly: commit the straw man fallacy with cal.
00:28:02.730 --> 00:28:03.810
Andy Miller III: Right right right.
00:28:03.960 --> 00:28:11.850
Matt O'Reilly: you give me the absolute best version of the other view as you possibly can, because if you give me a week version of it.
00:28:12.810 --> 00:28:22.890
Matt O'Reilly: Your argument won't be credible right you've got to argue against the real thing 1111 scholar I forget who was one Professor said, give me a steel man, not a straw man.
00:28:23.280 --> 00:28:23.790
Andy Miller III: There you go.
00:28:23.910 --> 00:28:33.660
Matt O'Reilly: Are you against the steel man, not a strong right so for Burke and strain to say people like us reject the trudge the authority of scripture.
00:28:34.380 --> 00:28:49.560
Matt O'Reilly: And are fuzzy on its truthfulness, then that like that's a straw man because that's not how that's not like we weren't quite we work hard to have a robust view of the trustworthiness, and the authorities.
00:28:50.730 --> 00:28:59.520
Matt O'Reilly: And so, when they go and attribute things to us that we don't actually hold they're committing a straw man fallacy, and it under my and and it undermines.
00:28:59.580 --> 00:29:00.960
Matt O'Reilly: It undermines their credibility.
00:29:01.950 --> 00:29:06.360
Matt O'Reilly: The issue with this particular debate is these guys know better.
00:29:07.470 --> 00:29:14.790
Matt O'Reilly: Right they're not they're not novices they're not rookies this isn't their first, the first time they argue this debate, they know.
00:29:15.450 --> 00:29:23.340
Matt O'Reilly: Who been witherington is or they should because he's been riding on this for decades right Lucy pepe it.
00:29:23.910 --> 00:29:32.370
Matt O'Reilly: Lynn kogi like there Craig keener there are plenty of folks who have written on this to affirm the truthfulness of scripture and disagree with them.
00:29:32.790 --> 00:29:45.270
Matt O'Reilly: And so, so it's miss the reason that I took a rather more prophetic posture calling them to repent is because I think they're just lying there committing as they're leading people they are acting.
00:29:45.330 --> 00:29:45.630
Andy Miller III: As an.
00:29:45.750 --> 00:29:50.640
Matt O'Reilly: Employee and that may seem like a strong statement, but I think it's true right.
00:29:52.020 --> 00:30:00.570
Matt O'Reilly: You know, and you get this tone and in berks argument he says well these folks say they affirm the authority of scripture but they don't really right that's that's a lot.
00:30:01.050 --> 00:30:02.310
Andy Miller III: it's just not true right right.
00:30:02.820 --> 00:30:10.140
Andy Miller III: I appreciate you hitting this mountain out Oh, I want to get next page some of the passages and we'll talk about this more you can actually look at i'm sorry I have.
00:30:10.380 --> 00:30:18.960
Andy Miller III: A lawn mower outside my office, right now, so if you're here, please forgive me folks i'll just try to keep talking here, I have leaves BERT personnel up in my windows that kind of thing so.
00:30:19.800 --> 00:30:29.820
Andy Miller III: Could you present think of that the steel man view the charitable view what's the charitable view of their position kind of like In summary, like two to three minutes.
00:30:29.970 --> 00:30:36.360
Andy Miller III: And then let's get let's go let's look at like maybe at first Corinthians 12 and 14 and look at some of those after that but let's look.
00:30:36.360 --> 00:30:37.290
Andy Miller III: what's the steel man.
00:30:37.830 --> 00:30:40.110
Matt O'Reilly: So so for the commentary in.
00:30:40.800 --> 00:30:54.450
Matt O'Reilly: First, Timothy Chapter two is really the crucial text, there are some others that are important, but this one is particularly significant and it's it's train new the new revised standard version translates it this way.
00:30:56.340 --> 00:31:07.230
Matt O'Reilly: it's first Timothy 211 let a woman learn in silence with full submission I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man, she is to keep silent.
00:31:07.860 --> 00:31:13.800
Matt O'Reilly: For Adam was formed first then Eve and Adam was not deceive but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.
00:31:14.490 --> 00:31:28.350
Matt O'Reilly: And so the argument is Paul says very clearly that women shall not teacher have authority and folks like don Carson and TIM Keller argue that that's not two things it's one things it's exercise authority by teaching.
00:31:28.740 --> 00:31:29.850
Matt O'Reilly: Right it's how I would put it.
00:31:30.930 --> 00:31:32.400
Matt O'Reilly: And so, so.
00:31:33.870 --> 00:31:40.320
Matt O'Reilly: You know so so you hear folks say things like you know how you can go and take this commandment omen shall not teach.
00:31:40.950 --> 00:31:52.380
Matt O'Reilly: exercise authority by teaching and think that it's okay for women to be pastors and teach and have pastoral authority you've just catch this verse aside right, you might as well, read that page of your Bible.
00:31:54.240 --> 00:31:58.770
Matt O'Reilly: And so, so so that's the argument just in summary form.
00:31:59.220 --> 00:31:59.550
Andy Miller III: yeah.
00:31:59.910 --> 00:32:06.030
Matt O'Reilly: The problem with that is that it doesn't take into account the problems in this text.
00:32:06.450 --> 00:32:13.470
Matt O'Reilly: Right, for example, the word that Paul uses for authority here isn't the typical word he uses for authority.
00:32:14.220 --> 00:32:19.740
Matt O'Reilly: The word he uses for authority here only occurs one time and the entire New Testament it's called it's a.
00:32:20.520 --> 00:32:29.190
Matt O'Reilly: it's a hot box like dominoes it occurs here and nowhere else and the difficulty with that is the way that we will figure out what words mean.
00:32:29.670 --> 00:32:40.410
Matt O'Reilly: Is will say all right here's Paul and he uses the word for righteousness in all of these places, and so let's put them all on put them all up and go through and get a sense of the semantic range.
00:32:40.830 --> 00:32:45.330
Matt O'Reilly: yeah was it can mean different times in different ways, whether it's talking about god's own righteousness or my.
00:32:45.540 --> 00:32:56.820
Matt O'Reilly: Right just status before God different places that work and mean different things, and that range will give us kind of some options and then we'll go to specific texts and try to figure out which one of those options works in.
00:32:57.390 --> 00:33:06.720
Matt O'Reilly: Which text well this instance you don't get a semantic range, because you only have the word showing up one time, not only in Paul, but in the entire New Testament no one else uses this word.
00:33:07.260 --> 00:33:19.050
Matt O'Reilly: And so we don't get it's not his typical word right, so if Paul were sort of sort of borrowing women from typical authoritative teaching wouldn't we expect him to use the normal word he uses for that.
00:33:20.220 --> 00:33:25.320
Matt O'Reilly: And, in this instance outside of the New Testament the word he uses here typically has negative connotations.
00:33:25.650 --> 00:33:33.630
Matt O'Reilly: So it's more usurping authority that doesn't belong to you, those sorts of things, and so my my suggestion is what we have here is.
00:33:33.960 --> 00:33:44.040
Matt O'Reilly: You have, first of all, it would be unusual for women to be sitting at the feet of men learning anyway that's a that's a student posture you know, a rabbi would gather his students around him.
00:33:44.370 --> 00:33:44.790
Matt O'Reilly: and
00:33:45.000 --> 00:34:00.660
Matt O'Reilly: In the Jewish context and teach them a man teaching men you wouldn't typically have women in that in that setting, and so the very fact that the women are in this place learning strikes me as as a typical anyway and sort of countercultural.
00:34:00.840 --> 00:34:01.410
Andy Miller III: That versa.
00:34:01.440 --> 00:34:04.950
Matt O'Reilly: For the for the first century GRECO Roman world and and then.
00:34:06.060 --> 00:34:14.550
Matt O'Reilly: You have this instance where, and so my suggestion is is these women are probably being taught in preparation to be teachers.
00:34:15.060 --> 00:34:30.090
Matt O'Reilly: But they need to finish their instruction first and not usurp authority that they haven't been trained for beforehand, I think that's an accurate reading and this takes the commentary and also say, well, the problem with that o'reilly is that Paul lodges this in the creation order.
00:34:30.510 --> 00:34:31.830
Matt O'Reilly: Adam was created first.
00:34:32.070 --> 00:34:35.250
Matt O'Reilly: He was created a second so that's an authoritative structure.
00:34:36.300 --> 00:34:44.280
Matt O'Reilly: He was created for she was created so again, she was to see the thing about, that is, though, is it's it's not quite it's not quite an argument from.
00:34:44.610 --> 00:34:50.490
Matt O'Reilly: Priority right it's an argument based on how the deception came about, and if you go back and look at genesis.
00:34:51.120 --> 00:35:05.040
Matt O'Reilly: In genesis to Adam gets the command not to eat the fruit before Eve is created, and then, when the serpent as Steve did God really say not to eat the fruit remember she wasn't there when the command was given she says he said don't eat it and he also said don't touch it.
00:35:05.430 --> 00:35:06.750
Matt O'Reilly: We never actually said don't touch it.
00:35:07.080 --> 00:35:14.340
Matt O'Reilly: He just said don't eat it, so the question that it takes invites us to ask the question where did where did that, where did that come from where did that extra prohibition come from.
00:35:14.850 --> 00:35:24.240
Matt O'Reilly: And it seems to me a thoroughly appropriate conclusion, to say that Adam was entrusted with instructing get like with transmitting god's word to her.
00:35:24.690 --> 00:35:42.030
Matt O'Reilly: So God gives us were to add them and it's Adams job to teach Eve, and if he had taught her well she wouldn't have been deceived, she would have been prepared for to do battle with the serpent right because he failed to transmit god's word like accurately.
00:35:43.080 --> 00:35:52.260
Matt O'Reilly: He set her up for for deception and failure, she touches it everything seems fine so she eats it and then he did, and they fall right, so the issue isn't.
00:35:53.760 --> 00:36:02.070
Matt O'Reilly: Does the first person have some sort of ontological inherent authority, the issue is how did the deception come about.
00:36:02.670 --> 00:36:12.300
Matt O'Reilly: hmm and the appeal to the creation story isn't about ontological authority or inherit male authority it's about how how Eve was deceived right so.
00:36:12.660 --> 00:36:20.550
Matt O'Reilly: So Eve was deceived because she hadn't been given the full to the accurate teaching and is that analogous to the argument of what's happening in.
00:36:21.120 --> 00:36:22.950
Andy Miller III: These women need to have that full teaching.
00:36:23.370 --> 00:36:25.740
Matt O'Reilly: yeah they need to get the whole story before they're ready to teach.
00:36:26.190 --> 00:36:30.600
Matt O'Reilly: Right, so they shouldn't negatively you serve some sort of teaching authority before they're.
00:36:30.960 --> 00:36:31.830
Andy Miller III: prepared right.
00:36:32.160 --> 00:36:36.690
Matt O'Reilly: I think that makes better sense of the creation of paul's appeal to the creation story.
00:36:38.580 --> 00:36:41.790
Matt O'Reilly: In light of what we actually get in first Timothy.
00:36:42.390 --> 00:36:48.990
Andy Miller III: that's good, so I mean we weren't even good at passes by I appreciate that because I like blue you're able to present that, in a way.
00:36:50.040 --> 00:37:01.860
Andy Miller III: That was again a good example of the way of dialogue Tara charitable way of presenting their view now of course they're going to disagree there'll be disagreements, but um let's let's jump to the first Corinthians.
00:37:02.730 --> 00:37:21.180
Andy Miller III: Two because, like, for instance in first Corinthians 14 women should remain silent in the churches, they are not allowed to speak but must be in submission as a law says and there's this interesting comparison with other places to even within this letter so help us with that matt.
00:37:21.480 --> 00:37:30.000
Matt O'Reilly: yeah so a lot of times when I write or speak about these things people will quote first Corinthians 1434 women should be silent, how can you be a pastor if you're supposed to be silent.
00:37:30.450 --> 00:37:30.870
Andy Miller III: Why and.
00:37:31.200 --> 00:37:43.290
Matt O'Reilly: The trouble with that again is not reading it in context so so Paul says, first, first of all, the question is what's an issue in first Corinthians 14 and the issue is orderly worship not who the pastor is.
00:37:43.500 --> 00:37:50.790
Matt O'Reilly: Alright, so I think it's a fault step initially to go and take a text that's written about how to maintain order in worship.
00:37:51.060 --> 00:38:01.710
Matt O'Reilly: And then extrapolate something out about pastoral offices that, in my view, is a really bad interpretive strategy, you can make the Bible say anything you want it to say, if you take things out of their context so.
00:38:01.710 --> 00:38:08.010
Matt O'Reilly: Right so Paul isn't even asking the question, who is the pastor here, nobody said, are women allowed to be pastors.
00:38:08.160 --> 00:38:09.150
Matt O'Reilly: Right sugars.
00:38:09.480 --> 00:38:16.740
Matt O'Reilly: Is if there's a disruption if a woman disrupts the orderliness of the service, how do we proceed we'll come back to that in a second.
00:38:18.900 --> 00:38:19.470
Matt O'Reilly: So.
00:38:21.180 --> 00:38:24.060
Matt O'Reilly: In the larger context, if you go back to first Corinthians 11.
00:38:24.600 --> 00:38:25.620
Matt O'Reilly: Paul says in.
00:38:25.800 --> 00:38:36.750
Matt O'Reilly: verse five any woman who prays or prophesies with their head on unveiled disgraces or hey we won't get into head coverings in this one that's a big issue in itself My point is simply to say in first Corinthians 11.
00:38:37.410 --> 00:38:48.540
Matt O'Reilly: Paul acknowledges that women do indeed speak in the gathered corporate worship right praying and prophesied right so praying and then prophesied will be some sort of.
00:38:49.380 --> 00:38:58.050
Matt O'Reilly: exhortation in the language of the people yeah not speaking in tongues but but but an understandable teaching instruction exhortation.
00:38:58.830 --> 00:39:11.760
Matt O'Reilly: On god's behalf as a in some prophetic role right so so whatever Paul means in first Corinthians 14 saying women shouldn't speak does not mean women shouldn't speak in every circumstance.
00:39:11.760 --> 00:39:18.450
Matt O'Reilly: I right because he's already given us to circumstances in which women are permitted to speak right.
00:39:18.690 --> 00:39:19.980
Matt O'Reilly: Right prophesied.
00:39:20.370 --> 00:39:23.670
Matt O'Reilly: So you cannot read first Corinthians 14.
00:39:23.940 --> 00:39:24.660
Andy Miller III: As this.
00:39:24.840 --> 00:39:32.610
Matt O'Reilly: Universal objective unqualified rejection of female speech in church.
00:39:32.940 --> 00:39:34.200
Matt O'Reilly: Right that's not what I did.
00:39:35.370 --> 00:39:46.470
Matt O'Reilly: And and and there's another another another point to be made as well and Lucy pepe it makes this point in some of her work on first Corinthians which I would give give listeners a link to her work.
00:39:47.400 --> 00:39:47.580
00:39:49.110 --> 00:39:57.750
Matt O'Reilly: Women in worship in Corinth but, but she makes the point you know do do these great painting the you know first first century Rome is a patriarchal society.
00:39:58.320 --> 00:40:05.010
Matt O'Reilly: And let's say let's just let's just play a little mind experiment thought experiment here let's say there are some rowdy women right who are just.
00:40:05.820 --> 00:40:15.840
Matt O'Reilly: Making a lot of noise and disrupting the worship service Do we really think the corinthian men are so weak that they have to take the time to write a letter to Paul to.
00:40:16.410 --> 00:40:31.530
Matt O'Reilly: To you know which will take time to get it written weeks to get it delivered time for him to compose a response weeks to get it sent back like and they're going to go on weeks and weeks and weeks and months and months, waiting for Paul to tell the women to be quiet.
00:40:32.040 --> 00:40:41.550
Matt O'Reilly: hmm I that's that's, not even a remotely reasonable hypothesis right a man in the first century, if he wants a woman to be quiet will tell her to be quiet.
00:40:42.000 --> 00:40:50.220
Matt O'Reilly: yeah he's not going to write somebody in another city and asked him to do that for it so so and a lot of people think that's what's happening here like the women are going crazy and the men are like what do we do.
00:40:51.120 --> 00:41:03.240
Matt O'Reilly: That like that's not a plausible hypotheses, what is it plausible hypotheses well it's Luke pepe it makes this argument she says it's possible that that Paul is here, quoting his opponents.
00:41:03.780 --> 00:41:08.730
Matt O'Reilly: it's not Paul, who says, a woman must be silent it's the corinthian opponents who say well.
00:41:09.240 --> 00:41:20.850
Matt O'Reilly: interesting and and and and here and the difficulty is coin agreed in the first century didn't use quotation marks so it's hard for us to know right, but the Corinthians would know if Paul were.
00:41:21.720 --> 00:41:31.950
Matt O'Reilly: Were summarizing their position or not, so the question then becomes well how do we, how do we, how do we discern these quotes and and all New Testament scholars agree that Paul quotes his opponents.
00:41:32.370 --> 00:41:48.360
Matt O'Reilly: Ryan first Corinthians in my work on Paul and the resurrection I deal with that, to some degree, I push back against that consensus about the length of the quotation in first Corinthians 612 to 20 right, so all New Testament scholars agree that Paul quotes his opponents in first Corinthians.
00:41:48.780 --> 00:41:49.770
Andy Miller III: Well, we have been here.
00:41:49.860 --> 00:41:52.620
Andy Miller III: At take me another podcast where we talk about this exact same thing.
00:41:52.920 --> 00:42:00.630
Andy Miller III: We had Dr Isaiah Allen on to talk about titus and he did his dissertation on the statement about the cretins always been lazy gluttons.
00:42:00.930 --> 00:42:08.430
Andy Miller III: So I think it's the same thing, like he asserts that what's going on here it's a quote like they would even say something like this.
00:42:08.970 --> 00:42:19.770
Andy Miller III: They would even say like that you're this way you lazy gluttons that type of thing so anyways this is, I just wanted to highlight if people are interested in that idea go back to my interview is a lie okay keep going back.
00:42:19.830 --> 00:42:26.550
Matt O'Reilly: there's a lot of great stuff on this so everybody agrees that call it quits his opponents, we will we don't agree on is the extent to which he closes opponents.
00:42:26.580 --> 00:42:27.210
Andy Miller III: And where it.
00:42:27.420 --> 00:42:40.020
Matt O'Reilly: says the bones, and so pepe it argues that one of the ways, you can that the ancient ancient authors would indicate that they were quoting someone else is like if it stands in direct contrast with something they've already said.
00:42:40.350 --> 00:42:40.650
Andy Miller III: yeah.
00:42:40.680 --> 00:42:49.290
Matt O'Reilly: Sure right, so if Paul says something that seems contradictory to something he's already said chances are in one instance he's quoting someone else.
00:42:49.530 --> 00:42:55.260
Matt O'Reilly: hmm and just a few minutes ago, we noted that in first Corinthians 11 Paul talks about occasions when women speak in worship.
00:42:55.710 --> 00:43:14.820
Matt O'Reilly: Right, so the this this this almost unqualified declaration that women must be silent seems to at least stand intention with that, if not contradicted which is at least, which is evidence that we should at least consider the fact that this may not be paul's words at all.
00:43:15.330 --> 00:43:16.410
Matt O'Reilly: yeah maybe voting.
00:43:16.800 --> 00:43:19.200
Matt O'Reilly: his opponents and so.
00:43:19.350 --> 00:43:20.250
Matt O'Reilly: Here here's the.
00:43:20.280 --> 00:43:21.240
Matt O'Reilly: here's the thing for me.
00:43:23.400 --> 00:43:30.510
Matt O'Reilly: Compliments marion's tend to treat these texts as eminently clear open and shut cases.
00:43:31.500 --> 00:43:42.840
Matt O'Reilly: And the problem is first Timothy to first Corinthians 11 and 14 are some of the most problematic text in the New Testament grab a commentary.
00:43:43.740 --> 00:43:51.420
Matt O'Reilly: You grab a critical commentary on first Corinthians and you read the sections on 11 and 14 and any scholar worth her or his salt.
00:43:51.810 --> 00:44:01.860
Matt O'Reilly: will acknowledge that there are manifold difficulties to actually an exegetical E with interpreting these these texts specifically and then from for me then.
00:44:02.160 --> 00:44:05.460
Matt O'Reilly: The question then becomes Am I comfortable telling.
00:44:06.090 --> 00:44:08.070
Matt O'Reilly: Right half of the Church.
00:44:08.280 --> 00:44:10.560
Matt O'Reilly: Right you're not qualified.
00:44:10.650 --> 00:44:11.910
Andy Miller III: or even a third of the Church.
00:44:12.090 --> 00:44:13.710
Matt O'Reilly: yeah yeah the women.
00:44:13.980 --> 00:44:14.220
00:44:15.660 --> 00:44:16.350
Matt O'Reilly: In your.
00:44:16.380 --> 00:44:23.280
Matt O'Reilly: your sense of call is invalid based on some of the most problematic and difficult takes in the entire candidates.
00:44:23.940 --> 00:44:26.130
Matt O'Reilly: yeah man to me just seems irresponsible.
00:44:27.990 --> 00:44:28.320
Matt O'Reilly: and wrong.
00:44:28.350 --> 00:44:37.500
Andy Miller III: yeah hey man, this is so interesting in you're not denying anything about the differences that people have that men and women have.
00:44:37.860 --> 00:44:41.970
Andy Miller III: The complementary nature of the human body or anything like that this is like just saying like.
00:44:42.180 --> 00:44:51.330
Andy Miller III: there's not really a good foundation to question people I think that's and I hope, people can walk away like even if we're not a serious I think matt you could.
00:44:51.600 --> 00:44:55.830
Andy Miller III: You could be a full out complimentary and and present this view.
00:44:56.130 --> 00:45:09.690
Andy Miller III: present this say right this same article, because what we're trying to say is this is not a healthy approach within evangelicalism to come in amongst people who share the authority of scripture to come at it this way.
00:45:09.990 --> 00:45:24.510
Andy Miller III: To be able to say these controversial controversial texts that have vast problems is not a way to be the ruler like like thinking of like a ruler, or like a guide or a cannon for how we think about these passages.
00:45:24.780 --> 00:45:31.710
Matt O'Reilly: yeah that's right and and I remember my PhD Professor Andrew Lincoln said to me one time, he said it's not a problem to name the problem.
00:45:32.190 --> 00:45:32.580
Andy Miller III: Right.
00:45:32.910 --> 00:45:39.090
Matt O'Reilly: Its own like these are 2000 year old text written in a language that is in US anymore.
00:45:40.350 --> 00:45:45.600
Matt O'Reilly: In the same way, and there are like there are difficulties with that.
00:45:45.990 --> 00:45:46.290
Andy Miller III: yeah.
00:45:46.500 --> 00:45:48.120
Matt O'Reilly: it's not it's I mean.
00:45:49.350 --> 00:45:50.280
Matt O'Reilly: it's hard work.
00:45:50.610 --> 00:45:55.710
Matt O'Reilly: Right so and and and and for me part of taking the Bible seriously.
00:45:56.100 --> 00:45:58.650
Matt O'Reilly: means being honest when the Bible is difficult.
00:45:59.340 --> 00:45:59.820
Andy Miller III: Right.
00:46:00.060 --> 00:46:13.350
Matt O'Reilly: If there are textual variance if there are exegetical difficulties if there are places where there's tension like I don't want to say past story I don't want to say the congregation This is absolutely crystal clear no questions asked.
00:46:13.560 --> 00:46:15.000
Matt O'Reilly: Right, I want to say you know what.
00:46:15.540 --> 00:46:28.920
Matt O'Reilly: God has given us the scriptures and in his wisdom he's done it through this process of Revelation and canonization and he's done it providential and we have it in our language but that doesn't mean there aren't difficulties.
00:46:29.130 --> 00:46:30.840
Matt O'Reilly: Right, there are problems.
00:46:31.080 --> 00:46:36.600
Matt O'Reilly: It doesn't mean that he does that God doesn't expect us to approach this with some humility and some charity.
00:46:37.020 --> 00:46:44.400
Matt O'Reilly: Right, I think, just sort of pretending the problems don't exist are saying, well, some people think those are problems but they're not really is just really dishonest.
00:46:44.700 --> 00:46:48.120
Matt O'Reilly: And in my view, a person who won't acknowledge exegetical difficulties.
00:46:48.180 --> 00:46:50.100
Matt O'Reilly: Really isn't taking the Bible seriously at all.
00:46:50.130 --> 00:46:57.780
Andy Miller III: wow yeah good point and it's good reason for it to be a secondary issue like a secondary tertiary issue.
00:46:58.080 --> 00:47:01.470
Matt O'Reilly: that's exactly why it's tier two tier three because.
00:47:01.650 --> 00:47:04.290
Andy Miller III: You bring up the text, a few weeks ago we had.
00:47:04.470 --> 00:47:11.190
Andy Miller III: Our other colleague David shriner on Dr David shriner to talk about her arm in the in joshua.
00:47:11.670 --> 00:47:18.930
Andy Miller III: The for totally destroy totally devote devote to the band, and he was just saying like look with this word I would have.
00:47:19.290 --> 00:47:21.510
Andy Miller III: A student will get a good grade for me if they say.
00:47:21.780 --> 00:47:34.140
Andy Miller III: No God harass them, you know, like like, in this case like that's a good translation because it's really a hard thing to get to what the actual meaning is like really, and this is why in most translations that you have.
00:47:34.650 --> 00:47:38.160
Andy Miller III: We if you get to it and you look down if you see like a little footnote.
00:47:38.400 --> 00:47:49.170
Andy Miller III: And there's all kinds of words, it means like it could be decent sometimes those things are completely different because a textual traditions, this does it underscore or underrate the authority of scripture but we just seen a recognized.
00:47:49.530 --> 00:47:57.930
Andy Miller III: problematic passages when they come about and we can then trust that God is going to lead us and direct us we use other methods for being able to get to meaning.
00:47:58.230 --> 00:48:03.540
Matt O'Reilly: You know and that's, not to say that we can't understand the Bible and it's not only scholars, are the ones who get to do it.
00:48:03.600 --> 00:48:04.620
Andy Miller III: Right right right.
00:48:04.890 --> 00:48:05.640
Matt O'Reilly: The Church isn't.
00:48:05.730 --> 00:48:13.200
Matt O'Reilly: is a community of people who read scripture together lady clergy scholars popular level readers.
00:48:14.310 --> 00:48:16.680
Matt O'Reilly: You know, and we do our best together.
00:48:17.040 --> 00:48:17.610
Andy Miller III: And we.
00:48:17.670 --> 00:48:25.110
Matt O'Reilly: bring something to the table we don't want an elitist kind of academic thing where only the people who read Greek get to say what the Bible means.
00:48:25.110 --> 00:48:26.130
Andy Miller III: Right right right.
00:48:26.490 --> 00:48:34.140
Matt O'Reilly: But we do want to be honest about what we're dealing with in the Bible and take that serious and so like that's that's that's kind of where I am on it.
00:48:35.610 --> 00:48:52.500
Matt O'Reilly: And it seems to me that and it happens frequently people will say, like a YouTube video about Evan egalitarianism, people will just say it's clear women on can speak or it's clear women can teach and it's not clear at all.
00:48:52.890 --> 00:48:56.640
Matt O'Reilly: yeah those those texts are complicated.
00:48:57.060 --> 00:48:57.780
Matt O'Reilly: yeah cool.
00:48:58.890 --> 00:49:02.940
Matt O'Reilly: And we if we if we respect the Bible, we should be honest about that.
00:49:03.150 --> 00:49:12.930
Andy Miller III: yeah I says different interpretations matt thanks for taking time to work through this complicated issue and and again, if you like, what you hear here.
00:49:13.350 --> 00:49:23.400
Andy Miller III: I encourage you to go wps.edu where you could study with Dr matt o'reilly so now he's not full time Professor here, but he does teach regularly as an adjunct and in our demon.
00:49:23.700 --> 00:49:32.010
Andy Miller III: course so well, and we have many people who might be interested in working through a demon and matt helps guide that process as people work through their dissertation yeah you got one thing.
00:49:32.310 --> 00:49:37.110
Matt O'Reilly: i'll plug the demon program this way, if you like, what you heard about the pastor theologian.
00:49:37.110 --> 00:49:38.070
Andy Miller III: role yeah.
00:49:38.160 --> 00:49:46.710
Matt O'Reilly: And you want to be the sort of pastor who can lead your church theologically then our doctor ministry will be of interest to you.
00:49:46.920 --> 00:49:47.130
00:49:48.240 --> 00:50:02.550
Andy Miller III: yeah and matt Orleans one question with the I hear I generally ask people what's more to the story for you, like a lot of times like people might know you a little bit maybe know you on Twitter but tell us a little bit more about men o'reilly let something that Bay people don't know.
00:50:02.910 --> 00:50:06.210
Matt O'Reilly: Oh, I love to play the guitar.
00:50:06.240 --> 00:50:07.080
Matt O'Reilly: and
00:50:07.380 --> 00:50:10.140
Matt O'Reilly: I do it as much as I can, which isn't as much as i'd like.
00:50:11.100 --> 00:50:16.770
Andy Miller III: Interesting now I thought we were going to hear something about all burn or something like that you certainly an auburn fan right.
00:50:16.860 --> 00:50:20.790
Matt O'Reilly: Over basketball is rocking and rolling over footballs got a ways to go.
00:50:22.620 --> 00:50:31.890
Andy Miller III: yeah we'll see what happens in the tournament one of my favorite times of the year is coming up soon, and you guys are positioned better than my indiana hoosiers at the moment but we'll see what happens.
00:50:32.100 --> 00:50:34.410
Andy Miller III: We will thanks matt God bless you.